16 locations · 8 jurisdictions · 19 facilities · AS204287

Choose your legal distance

Every location below publishes the statutes and court decisions behind its privacy claims, its measured latency from five sources, and a section headed “the trade-off” describing what it does not protect you from.

Answer

Incognito VPS operates 16 locations. 8 of them were chosen for their legal properties — Iceland, Switzerland, Netherlands, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Panama and Russia — and 8 were chosen for latency and peering, with no jurisdictional claim attached. Each location page publishes the statutes behind its claims, its measured latency from five sources, and an explicit account of what that jurisdiction does not protect against.

Incognito VPS facility chart Facilities plotted by latitude and longitude: Reykjavík, Iceland; Zürich, Switzerland; Amsterdam, Netherlands; Bucharest, Romania; Sofia, Bulgaria; Chișinău, Moldova; Panama City, Panama; Moscow, Russia; Paris, France; London, United Kingdom; Frankfurt, Germany; New York, United States; Toronto, Canada; Singapore, Singapore; Tokyo, Japan; Sydney, Australia. 100°W80°W60°W40°W20°W20°E40°E60°E 60°N45°N30°N15°N Iceland IS · $5.5 Switzerland CH · $6 Netherlands NL · $4.5 Romania RO · $4 Bulgaria BG · $4 Moldova MD · $4 Panama PA · $5 Russia RU · $4 France FR · $4.5 United Kingdom GB · $4.5 Germany DE · $4.5 United States US · $4.5 Canada CA · $4.5 Singapore SG · $5.5 Japan JP · $5.5 Australia AU · $5.5
Facility locations: Reykjavík, Iceland (64.15, -21.94); Zürich, Switzerland (47.38, 8.54); Amsterdam, Netherlands (52.37, 4.90); Bucharest, Romania (44.43, 26.10); Sofia, Bulgaria (42.70, 23.32); Chișinău, Moldova (47.01, 28.86); Panama City, Panama (8.98, -79.52); Moscow, Russia (55.76, 37.62); Paris, France (48.86, 2.35); London, United Kingdom (51.51, -0.13); Frankfurt, Germany (50.11, 8.68); New York, United States (40.71, -74.01); Toronto, Canada (43.65, -79.38); Singapore, Singapore (1.35, 103.82); Tokyo, Japan (35.68, 139.65); Sydney, Australia (-33.87, 151.21).
§01 Jurisdiction index

Sixteen legal regimes, side by side

Published as an open dataset under CC BY 4.0. Machine-readable copies at /jurisdictions.json and /servers.md.

JSON
Legal and network properties of each Incognito VPS location
Locations EU memberEyes allianceData retentionUS DMCA forceFrankfurtPrice index
Iceland Reykjavík No None No general data-retention obligation applies to hosting providers (2022) None 41 ms 1.32
Switzerland Zürich No None See dossier None 8 ms 1.45
Netherlands Amsterdam Yes Nine Blanket telecom data retention struck down and never re-enacted (2015) None 7 ms 1.16
Romania Bucharest Yes None Data-retention law struck down as unconstitutional — twice (2014) None 29 ms 1.06
Bulgaria Sofia Yes None Blanket retention provisions annulled as unconstitutional (2015) None 34 ms 1.00
Moldova Chișinău No None No general data-retention mandate on hosting providers (2007) None 42 ms 1.02
Panama Panama City No None No general data-retention statute covering hosting providers (2009) None 132 ms 1.24
Russia Moscow No None See dossier None 38 ms 1.02
France Paris Yes Nine Connection-data retention is mandatory and applies to hosting providers (2021) None 11 ms 1.12
United Kingdom London No Five Retention notices may compel operators to keep communications data for 12 months (2016) None 14 ms 1.18
Germany Frankfurt Yes Fourteen General data retention struck down as unconstitutional and unenforced since (2010) None 1 ms 1.08
United States New York No Five No federal general data-retention mandate applies to hosting providers (2026) Direct 84 ms 1.15
Canada Toronto No Five No general data-retention mandate for hosting providers (2000) None 92 ms 1.14
Singapore Singapore No None See dossier None 155 ms 1.34
Japan Tokyo No None No general data-retention mandate for hosting providers (1984) None 224 ms 1.38
Australia Sydney No Five Two-year mandatory retention of telecommunications metadata (2015) None 258 ms 1.41
§02 Chosen for the law

Eight jurisdictions, chosen for their legal properties

Each of these publishes the statutes and court decisions behind its claims, plus a section on what that jurisdiction does not give you.

Iceland

Free-speech haven

IS Jurisdiction
  • No general data-retention obligation applies to hosting providers (2022)
  • Constitutional free-expression protection with narrow, enumerated exceptions (1995)

VPS

$5.5

Dedicated

$60.5

Switzerland

Premium neutrality

CH Jurisdiction
  • Revised federal data-protection statute with criminal liability for unlawful disclosure (2023)
  • Foreign requests must run through mutual legal assistance with dual-criminality review (1983)

VPS

$6

Dedicated

$66.5

Netherlands

Best peering on earth

NL Jurisdiction
  • Blanket telecom data retention struck down and never re-enacted (2015)
  • Hosting providers benefit from conditional liability exemption (mere conduit / hosting) (2024)

VPS

$4.5

Dedicated

$53.5

Romania

Anti-retention precedent

RO Jurisdiction
  • Data-retention law struck down as unconstitutional — twice (2014)
  • Follow-up retention bill also declared unconstitutional (2014)

VPS

$4

Dedicated

$49

Bulgaria

Low-cost EU edge

BG Jurisdiction
  • Blanket retention provisions annulled as unconstitutional (2015)
  • Retention now requires prior judicial authorisation per request (2015)

VPS

$4

Dedicated

$46

Moldova

Outside the EU perimeter

MD Jurisdiction
  • Non-EU state — EU instruments including European Investigation Orders do not apply (2022)
  • No general data-retention mandate on hosting providers (2007)

VPS

$4

Dedicated

$47

Panama

No MLAT with the West

PA Jurisdiction
  • Constitutional protection of private communications requiring judicial authorisation (2004)
  • No general data-retention statute covering hosting providers (2009)

VPS

$5

Dedicated

$57

Russia

Beyond Western reach

RU Jurisdiction
  • EU and US court orders have no enforcement path; MLAT cooperation suspended since 2022 (2022)
  • US DMCA and EU DSA carry no legal force in Russian courts (2008)

VPS

$4

Dedicated

$47

§03 Chosen for the network

Eight mainstream sites, chosen for latency

These are proximity and peering choices. None of them is a privacy jurisdiction — several are Five Eyes members with retention mandates — and each page says so plainly. Pick one because your users are nearby, not because of its law.

France

Western Europe, lowest latency

FR Latency
  • Connection-data retention is mandatory and applies to hosting providers (2021)
  • General retention upheld for national-security purposes (2021)

VPS

$4.5

Dedicated

$51.5

United Kingdom

London transit hub

GB Latency
  • Retention notices may compel operators to keep communications data for 12 months (2016)
  • Technical capability notices may require removal of electronic protection (2016)

VPS

$4.5

Dedicated

$54.5

Germany

DE-CIX, best peering in Europe

DE Latency
  • General data retention struck down as unconstitutional and unenforced since (2010)
  • German general retention held contrary to EU law by the Court of Justice (2022)

VPS

$4.5

Dedicated

$49.5

United States

North American reach

US Latency
  • No federal general data-retention mandate applies to hosting providers (2026)
  • Providers must disclose data under warrant regardless of where it is stored (2018)

VPS

$4.5

Dedicated

$53

Canada

North America, softer copyright

CA Latency
  • No general data-retention mandate for hosting providers (2000)
  • Copyright notices are forwarded, not enforced — no takedown obligation (2015)

VPS

$4.5

Dedicated

$52.5

Singapore

Asia-Pacific gateway

SG Latency
  • No documented participation in any Eyes intelligence-sharing tier (2026)
  • Government may order correction or removal of online statements (2019)

VPS

$5.5

Dedicated

$61.5

Japan

East Asia, constitutional secrecy

JP Latency
  • Constitutional secrecy of communications with narrow statutory exceptions (1947)
  • No general data-retention mandate for hosting providers (1984)

VPS

$5.5

Dedicated

$63.5

Australia

Oceania coverage

AU Latency
  • Two-year mandatory retention of telecommunications metadata (2015)
  • Providers may be compelled to assist with access to encrypted communications (2018)

VPS

$5.5

Dedicated

$65

§04 Starting prices

What each product costs where

Starting price by product line and location
Location VPSDedicatedGPURDPStorage
Iceland $5.5 $60.5 $157 $21
Switzerland $6 $66.5 $23
Netherlands $4.5 $53.5 $138 $11 $18.5
Romania $4 $49 $126 $10 $17
Bulgaria $4 $46 $9.5 $16
Moldova $4 $47 $121.5 $9.5 $16.5
Panama $5 $57 $20
Russia $4 $47 $9.5
France $4.5 $51.5 $133.5 $10.5 $18
United Kingdom $4.5 $54.5 $11 $19
Germany $4.5 $49.5 $128.5 $10.5 $17.5
United States $4.5 $53 $137 $11 $18.5
Canada $4.5 $52.5 $11 $18
Singapore $5.5 $61.5 $159.5 $21.5
Japan $5.5 $63.5 $164 $22
Australia $5.5 $65 $13.5 $22.5

55-second deploy

Pick a jurisdiction. Pay in crypto. Be running in a minute.

No account to create, no email to confirm, no card to enter.